Version 1
(of 1)
|
Version created on:
01/02/11 @ 11:22:14
by:
Paul Fisher
|
Revision comments
Last edited on: 01/02/11 @ 11:24:42 by: Paul Fisher
Title: Rank Phenotype Terms
Type: Taverna 2
Preview
(Click on the image to get the full size)
Description
This workflow counts the number of articles in the pubmed database in which each term occurs, and identifies the total number of articles in the entire PubMed database. It also identified the total number of articles within pubmed so that a term enrichment score may be calculated. The workflow also takes in a document containing abstracts that are related to a particular phenotype. Scientiifc terms are then extracted from this text and given a weighting according to the number of terms that appear in the document. The higher the value the better the score. This is given as: X = log((a / b) / (c / d)) where: a = number of occurnaces of individual terms in phenotype corpus b = number of abstracts in entire phenotype corpus c = number of occurnaces of individual terms in entire pubmed d = number of articles in entire pubmed Once this has been created, the pathways obtained from the QTL and microarray pathway analysis workflows are analysed. The documents from a search of each pathway in pubmed are merged into a single document of pathway abstracts. The (unweighted) phenotype terms are then searched in the pathways corpus. This will determine if the phenotype term is listed with the given pathway. The higher the value the better the score. Each term is then assigned a weight as: Y = log((e / f) / (c /d)) where: a = number of occurnaces of individual terms in pathway corpus b = number of abstracts in pathway corpus (per pathway) c = number of occurnaces of individual terms in entire pubmed d = number of articles in entire pubmed The weighted terms are then given a link score. This is the total of: X + Y. This gives the link between the pathway and the phenotype a score / significance value. The higher the score the more "appropriate/interesting" the link between the pathway and the phenotype. The terms are also ranked according to the number of pathways which have been given a weight. This is calculated as: W = Sum( X + Y). The higher the value the better the score.
This workflow calculates the cosine vector space between two sets of corpora. The workflow then removes any null values from the output. this is some extra text vbeing added It also counts the number of articles in the pubmed database in which each term occurs, and identifies the total number of articles in the entire PubMed database. It also identified the total number of articles within pubmed so that a term enrichment score may be calculated. The workflow also takes in a document containing abstracts that are related to a particular phenotype. Scientiifc terms are then extracted from this text and given a weighting according to the number of terms that appear in the document. The higher the value the better the score. This is given as: X = log((a / b) / (c / d)) where: a = number of occurnaces of individual terms in phenotype corpus b = number of abstracts in entire phenotype corpus c = number of occurnaces of individual terms in entire pubmed d = number of articles in entire pubmed Once this has been created, the pathways obtained from the QTL and microarray pathway analysis workflows are analysed. The documents from a search of each pathway in pubmed are merged into a single document of pathway abstracts. The (unweighted) phenotype terms are then searched in the pathways corpus. This will determine if the phenotype term is listed with the given pathway. The higher the value the better the score. Each term is then assigned a weight as: Y = log((e / f) / (c /d)) where: a = number of occurnaces of individual terms in pathway corpus b = number of abstracts in pathway corpus (per pathway) c = number of occurnaces of individual terms in entire pubmed d = number of articles in entire pubmed The weighted terms are then given a link score. This is the total of: X + Y. This gives the link between the pathway and the phenotype a score / significance value. The higher the score the more "appropriate/interesting" the link between the pathway and the phenotype. The terms are also ranked according to the number of pathways which have been given a weight. This is calculated as: W = Sum( X + Y). The higher the value the better the score.
Download
Run
Option 1:
Copy and paste this link into File > 'Open workflow location...'
http://www.myexperiment.org/workflows/1806/download?version=1
[ More Info
]
Workflow Components
Authors (1)
Titles (1)
Descriptions (2)
Workflow Type
Log in to add Tags
Shared with Groups (0)
None
Current:
0.0 / 5
(0 ratings)
Log in to rate and see breakdown of ratings
Statistics
None
Earliest Version:
[1] - Rank Phenotype Terms
This Workflow only has one version.
Reviews
(0)
Other workflows that use similar services
(4)
Only the first 2 workflows that use similar services are shown. View all workflows that use these services.
|
Original Uploader |
Created: 24/05/11 @ 13:13:52 | Last updated: 24/05/11 @ 14:19:24
Credits:
Attributions:
License: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License
This workflow takes the input file containing chemical names and returns a single SDF file of structures. The names are searched against pubchem compounds via e-search.
If the compound name is found an XML file containing PubChem ID is returned.The max return compound_ID is set to 1 which could be increased. If the compound name is not found then no ID is returned.
The pubchem compound_ID is then used to download structures from PubChem.
Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings) | Versions: 1 | Reviews: 0 | Comments: 0 | Citations: 0 Viewed: 39 times | Downloaded: 19 times Tags (26): |
View
Download (v1)
|
|
Original Uploader |
Created: 08/02/11 @ 13:04:06 | Last updated: 10/02/11 @ 16:01:41
Credits:
Attributions:
License: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License
This workflow takes in a list of gene names and searches the PubMed database for corresponding articles. Any matches to the genes are then retrieved (abstracts only). These abstracts are then returned to the user.
Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings) | Versions: 4 | Reviews: 0 | Comments: 0 | Citations: 0 Viewed: 43 times | Downloaded: 23 times Tags (30): |
View
Download (v4)
|
Linked Data
Non-Information Resource URI: http://www.myexperiment.org/workflows/1806
Alternative Formats
Copyright © 2007 - 2011 The University of Manchester and University of Southampton
No comments yet
Log in to make a comment